Bid and award data review
We compare how opportunities, bid packages and awards are recorded across divisions, and whether win rates and backlog can be trusted. Stage definitions, required fields at bid submission and lost-reason values are checked for consistency. Where estimating totals are typed in by hand rather than synced, we flag the risk of pipeline figures drifting from the estimate that actually went to the owner.
Company and contact cleanup
General contractors, subcontractors, owners and design firms often exist several times under slightly different names, or as a mix of accounts and contacts. We measure the duplication, look at how companies are classified by role, and recommend a model that lets one firm play different roles on different projects without creating another record each time it appears. Role picklists are checked for consistency across divisions.
Bid confidentiality and access
Pricing before award, joint-venture terms and fee structures should be visible to a small group. We test sharing rules, role hierarchy, report folders and list views to see who can reach that information, including field staff, former employees and any partner users. Overly broad export permissions are listed separately because they are the fastest way for bid data to leave the building.
Custom object and debt inventory
Construction orgs tend to grow custom objects for projects, prequalification, safety records and change orders, often built by different admins. We catalog each one, check whether it is still used and identify overlaps, such as two project objects feeding different reports. Unused fields, dead flows and abandoned installed packages are listed with a recommendation to retire, consolidate or keep. Each recommendation notes which reports depend on it.